Today, they operate at a distance of about one kilometer. In World War II, when the shooting was at a distance of 70-100 meters, snipers could raise their heads a little to have some visibility. So, he has to search for an elevated area in the terrain, a small hill. They usually look for a perfect location, but the main requirement is good visibility.Įven if we take a perfectly flat surface, like a football field, and the shooter lies somewhere quietly, he won’t see anything at a distance of 400 meters. Sometimes you have to move around quite a lot sometimes you can shoot directly from your position.īut, snipers tend to shoot less and less from these positions, because they’ve all been used beforehand, so it’s quite risky to take up position and shoot from there. Personally, I’m categorically against it.Īs for the positions, it all depends on the terrain. I don’t quite understand who posts them or who allows servicemen or others to post them. Many videos of Ukrainian snipers working on the frontlines have begun appearing on Telegram channels. If they find a target, and it needs to be worked out, then one or two snipers get ready and advance to the position he activates the video recording, fires one or several shots… it all depends on the situation. Two snipers, one doing the surveillance, another communicating with other units and groups. To function in this mode, we need to work with a group of three or four people. At night, instead of a camera, we use thermal imaging binoculars, which are quite effective. We take turns watching and viewing images on the screen, and if necessary, making video captures. Sometimes, this surveillance lasts a week. The screen is installed in a secure place, where it will be easy to observe the area for several days. The camera and surveillance equipment are ordinary devices, but we use a high-quality camera on a tripod, which is controlled remotely and connected to the screen via a cable. They’re much simpler, but no less effective, even though we use civilian items for many of the components. We assemble such sets ourselves, on a volunteer basis. The military equivalent of such a set costs about EUR 80,000. Snipers use entire complexes, which include eye cams, computers, custom backpacks or adapted kits, etc. Nothing may be visible, either in the prone position or even in the sitting or standing position. You cannot just come and shoot from anywhere. There are few convenient firing positions on the front line. Of course, it requires some experience to understand from which place you can shoot, and from which position it would be unfeasible or very difficult to do so. This might be a potential position for an enemy sniper, so it should be monitored separately. Generally speaking, a sniper can determine from which enemy location it is convenient to install a firing position. The main problem is that headquarters do not fully understand how to use snipers. If an enemy sniper was there, he would have already moved to another position, and the position that our snipers are surveilling will remain empty for some time. But, that turns out to be pretty useless, because there’s no one there anymore. Let’s say the enemy fires a single shot somewhere or even hits a Ukrainian soldier… the command immediately sends in a sniper group. Unfortunately, military commanders do not always understand such subtleties. No enemy sniper will take up a position in the area. Of course, it won’t be so spectacular, but we’ll be sure no one will shoot from there, especially if the mortars are launched very quickly and effectively. For example, if there’s gunfire from a certain area, then four or five mortars will be more effective than a sniper duel. I would have probably bought it again if I did not own it, yet knew what I knew now.As they say in the army, the best remedy against a sniper is a 120mm mortar. I wouldn't say it was worth to $60 I paid, but definitely at least $30-$40. It's great hearing the cacophony of war suddenly change effect based on where you are (indoors v. The graphics are beautiful and the sound is nice. doesn't really make any sense, but whatever. The only other minor gripe is one or two historical inaccuracies, such as Soviet troops wearing winter clothing while besieging Berlin, or any other area that involves zero snow. I beat the game on maximum difficulty, and it wasn't too hard. It does get a bit frustrating, but it CAN be done. Instead of a road, you had a box to wander around in (and thus wasn't really open-world either).Ĭertain parts are a bit cheap, where you suddenly are facing a ridiculous amount of enemies. Granted, Sniper Elite 1 wasn't exactly that much more expansive. You're walking down a single road to the end, but it's a pretty wide road, enough to give you the illusion of freedom. It's a bit on rails, but they do a decent enough job of having that fact hidden away. So the final Verdict?I enjoyed it, to be honest.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |